Go to PDF Version | Go to Recent Issues
To save time in the future, you may select one of the preferences below. You may update your eIBD preferences at any time by going into My IBD and selecting Update Your eIBD Preferences.
Set Web-Based Version as Default Set PDF Version as Default Set Recent Issues as Default
Get QuoteSearch Site
Daily Graphs Online
President Obama prepares to drive the 2011 Chevy Volt as he tours a General Motors auto plant in Hamtramck, Mich., last Friday. With Assembly Plant... View Enlarged Image
Industrial Policy: The administration's electric car represents both the genius of American technology and the stupidity of its government. Imagine Rube Goldberg with $50 billion. Buy now and get a free 40-mile-long extension cord.
It wasn't exactly Michael Dukakis riding in a tank wearing a Snoopy helmet, but it was close. President Obama, who reportedly hasn't driven an inch himself since taking office, visited a GM plant in Hamtramck near Detroit on Friday to drive a Chevy Volt 10 feet off an assembly line. It was a perfect image, as the American economy is being driven off a cliff by this White House.
The administration, at taxpayers' expense, has labored mightily and brought forth an Edsel that needs to be recharged. If a camel is a horse designed by committee, the Chevy Volt is a car designed by government. It is a perfect example of industrial policy run amok, of what happens when government picks winners and losers. Without heavy subsidies and government ownership, it never would have been built.
The base sticker price is about $41,000, comparable to the base price for a BMW 335i. For that price, you could also get a good-sized SUV that can seat more than four people and get all your stuff back from the big-box store.
There's a $7,500 tax credit offered by our utterly bankrupt federal government that's supposed to help, but even a presidential commission in 2009 said the Volt "will likely be too expensive to be commercially successful in the short term."
The true cost of this car is staggering and makes you long for the day when the government bought $400 hammers. Not listed on the window sticker is the $50 billion bailout of a bankrupt car company. We are told we're getting the money back, but it's the government, not the taxpayer, and the money will be spent on something else.
We have to add in the $240 million in energy grants to GM from the Energy Department last summer, the $150 million in federal money to the Volt's Korean battery supplier and the $14 billion GM got in 2008 to "retool" its plants. Divide that by the 10,000 units in the initial production run, or even by the additional 45,000 units planned if initial sales go well.
So we built it anyway, largely because in 2008 candidate Obama pledged to put 1 million plug-in vehicles on the road by 2015. Not likely. What do you get for the money? A vehicle that seats only four because of a battery that runs down the center of the car. That battery can take the Volt an astonishing 40 miles.
Iran: President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is offering to meet one-on-one with President Obama. Is he mimicking the president's C-SPAN health reform powwow? Or is he getting scared? ...
Power: The federal government, according to Democratic Rep. Pete Stark, can do anything it wants. If there are indeed no checks on the state's power, as the congressman claims, then the state is a tyrant. Stark, who represents San Francisco's East Bay area, let the left's secret slip when he ...
The Border: Polls show Democrats have decisively lost the debate over granting amnesty to illegals. But has that stopped them? Hardly. Using the federal bureaucracy as their agent, they plan to do it anyway. This is what happens when big government becomes so powerful that those who run it ...
President Obama says his sweeping, across-the-board increases for every major federal tax rate starting next year are necessary for "the rich" to pay their fair share. "The rich" are defined as those making more than $250,000 per year. Those increases include a close-to-60% increase in the capital ...
Who could have imagined that the bailout of the auto industry, one of the single most unpopular moves by the Obama administration, would become one of its best talking points? But don't for an instant imagine that the comeback of the nation's rescued car companies, particularly General Motors, will ...
Posted By: cnptnow(475) on 8/3/2010 | 12:43 AM ET
The future will be electric cars. As batteries improve, and indeed they will with the lithium air battery, electric cars will have a far greater range and appeal with lower cost. Their power response leaves the IC engine in the dust. If the US government had not stepped in and demanded a US technology development/growth, the foreign car makers would have leaped ahead again. We now have a chance for the future of the US auto business.
Posted By: cnptnow(475) on 8/3/2010 | 12:26 AM ET
Additionally, the thermal conversion efficiency of gas and modern coal electricity plants is close to 50%. So, multiplying the electric car motor efficiency of 90% by the power plant efficiency still results in an electric car energy conversion efficiency almost double that of the internal combustion car. This is not liberal thinking, it is conservative thinking...conserving energy!
Posted By: cnptnow(475) on 8/3/2010 | 12:07 AM ET
The government has helped make available a high efficiency car option. The efficiency of an electric car motor is 90% compared to the internal combustion (IC) efficiency of only about 25% (because 75% is ejected as exhaust heat). The carbon footprint of an electric car is an order magnitude less the IC auto, regardless the source of the electricity, because the electric motor has neglible heat loss. Simple Math. Open your minds! If electricity source is renewable, then ZERO carbon for the EC!
Posted By: teaparty_too(45) on 8/2/2010 | 11:02 PM ET
as Rush said, I'll consider a Chevy VOLT when the President and members of the ruling elite in our government drive electric cars, and when Nancy Pelosi travels in a battery-powered airplane. They ought to promote Human Powered Vehicles like bicycles and make the roads safer so we can ride with the cars and not worry as much about getting run over.
Posted By: teaparty_too(45) on 8/2/2010 | 10:59 PM ET
I'll take a Prius over the VOLT any day. and for bebopping around town I can always use my Catrike recumbent bicycle and its tag-along trailer unless it too hot or cold. My trike is a 100% HPV that is fueled by hamburgers and candy bars
To participate in Community areas, please Sign In or Register
Register
Heavy-volume declines often signal trouble.
Get QuoteSearch Site
Read Full Article »
