Jobs Bill Would Unfairly Hit Muni Tax Status

Dow Jones Reprints: This copy is for your personal, non-commerical use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers, use the Order Reprints tool on any article or visit www.djreprints.com

Municipal bonds have always been synonymous with tax-free income. That would end if President Obama gets his way.

Under the jobs bill the President sent to Congress Monday, high-income individuals and families would no longer receive interest from state and municipal bonds free completely from federal income taxes, beginning in 2013. The legislation would also reduce the value of tax deductions for taxpayers in the highest bracket.

Specifically, individuals earning over $200,000 and families earning over $250,000 would effectively have the value of tax breaks against the top 35% bracket lowered to the 28% bracket.

The proposed change would help pay the $447 billion tab for the American Jobs Act of 2011. There have been previous attempts to enact a back-door tax hike on the upper brackets. Reformers have asserted that it is unfair that high-income taxpayers receive a greater benefit from deductions; a $1,000 deduction saves somebody in a 35% bracket $350, $70 more than the same deduction saves a taxpayer in the 28% bracket.

Never before have high-income investors in municipal bonds been so targeted, however. With the exception of so-called private-purpose bonds subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax, interest on munis generally was exempt from federal income taxes.

As with deductions, the tax-free feature on munis is more valuable to investors in the top income-tax brackets. For that reason, Internal Revenue Service data show that 58% of all tax-exempt income was earned by individuals earning over $200,000, according to The Bond Buyer, the muni-market trade paper.

For instance, a tax-free bond that yields 3.50% (about the going rate on a 30-year, triple-A muni) is equivalent to a taxable bond that yields 5.38% for an investor in the 35% tax bracket. But for an investor in the 28% bracket, that 3.50% muni is equivalent to a taxable yield of 4.86%.

All else being equal, the yield on muni bonds would have to rise to compensate for the lesser tax benefit, if the Obama jobs bill is enacted as proposed. For instance, a rise of 50 basis points (one-half percentage point) would result in a price decline of about 9% for a 30-year bond -- equal to $90,000 for a $1 million holding.

As a result, upper-income investors would suffer the dual blow of lower after-tax income and capital losses from their muni-bond portfolios.

That could severe repercussions for the muni market, which only in recent months has recovered from the so-far errant prediction of hundreds of defaults totaling billions of dollars from analyst Meredith Whitney.

"In my opinion, this will have a negative effect on the muni market and could start another wave of heavy withdrawals from muni-bond funds, even though many investors in these funds will be minimally affected," says Ken Woods, who head Asset Preservation Advisors, an Atlanta manager of bond portfolios specializing in high-net-worth individuals. "The muni investor's thought process will be, 'the government's next step could be the complete elimination of the [tax] exemption.'"

One of the ironies of this proposal in the so-called jobs bill is that the measure contains infrastructure spending, some $38 billion worth. It would also create an infrastructure bank to fund such projects.

But reducing demand for bonds issued by state and regional authorities that build highways, bridges, airports, water and sewer systems and transportation projections would hamper the very sort of projects the legislation seeks to encourage.

Obviously, the proposal to reduce the appeal of muni bonds to high-income investors is aimed at sentiments such as voiced recently by Berkshire Hathaway's Warren Buffett, who lamented his tax rate was lower than his secretary's.

If the Obama Administration wants to raise taxes on high earners to reduce income and wealth inequality, that is a legitimate question in a democracy. But it should be addressed forthrightly, not by back-door mechanisms.

And if Washington wants to change the tax status on newly issued bonds by states and municipalities, that also is legitimate. A direct subsidy to issuers is more efficient than tax exemption.

But to change the rules after the fact on an investment that has always been tax-free, as in the case of munis, isn't just counterproductive; it's not fair.

Comments? E-mail: randall.forsyth@barrons.com

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com

Twitter

Yahoo! Buzz

facebook

MySpace

Digg

LinkedIn

del.icio.us

NewsVine

StumbleUpon

Mixx

Sterne Agee cut the price target on the conglomerate to $51 from $63.

Shares of oil field-equipment maker Cameron International have upside tied to record orders.

Gerald L. Hassell bought 50,000 shares within days of being appointed.

PNC, Wells Fargo, BB&T and Fifth Third are seen as recommended.

The gaming and lodging firm won a long-awaited government approval.

By separating its markets and education businesses, the company should unlock value for investors.

Credit Suisse likes Air Products & Chemicals, Cytec and FMC.

The glass giant will see lower revenue and earnings through 2012.

RIM has surged since last month when Jefferies upgraded the stock. However, with Jefferies downgrading shares today, we'd be sellers.

Joseph W. Brown bought 100,000 shares shortly after a 52-week low.

For stocks, the seasonal pattern doesn't matter. Junk bonds are another story. (At SmartMoney.com.)

Airline stocks are ready to climb. The most likely to jet upward: United Continental, Delta, Alaska Air, Southwest and JetBlue.

With a profit squeeze on the horizon and the euro zone under fire, a savvy observer sees more decline for equities. A tribute to a great newspaperman.

The Federal Reserve needs to take dramatic action to stave off a second round of economic decline. Why the skeptics are wrong about quantitative easing.

Europe's unrelenting sovereign-debt crisis and the willingness of the Fed to further boost the U.S. economy imbue the dollar and Treasuries with the warm glow of security.

Jarden, the parent of First Alert, Rawlings, Sunbeam, Coleman and other consumer lines, is unfamiliar to many investors. But, based on its results, it shouldn't be.

Investors on both sides of the pond are spooked by rumors that Greece will default on its debt. Also, the attraction of biotech stocks.

A company-led tour of a gold mine can yield useful information. But it can't answer the big questions: how much gold is in the ground, and how much value is in the miner's shares?

Read Full Article »

Related Articles

Market Overview
Search Stock Quotes
Partner Videos