RSS FEED
Any way you slice or dice it, the April jobs report was terrible"”and terribly disappointing. Employers added just 115,000 workers to their payrolls last month, way below the 180,000 Wall Street economists were expecting. Hiring has now slowed in three straight months. Job growth in March and April averaged 135,000, down from an average 252,000 per month in the three months to February. As IHS Global Insight explains: “Prior job gains at over 200,000 per month were inconsistent with the modest pace of recovery in overall output "“ GDP was up only 2.2% in the first quarter. It now appears that jobs have decelerated into line with GDP, rather than GDP accelerating to catch up with jobs.”
And JPMorgan put it this way: “The April employment report was softer than expected and signaled a downshift in labor market momentum.”
Sure, the official unemployment rate dipped a tenth of a point lower to 8.1%, but that’s only because people continue to drop out of the workforce at an alarming pace. That workforce shrinkage, as measured by the labor force participation rate, totally distorts the true unemployment picture. In fact, the participation rate is now at its lowest level since 1981! (For comparison purposes, the economy added 480,000 jobs back in April 1984, during the Reagan recovery.)
So what is the true state of the labor market?
1. If the size of the U.S. labor force as a share of the total population was the same as it was when Barack Obama took office"”65.7% then vs. 63.6% today"”the U-3 unemployment rate would be 11.1%.
Now, this doesn’t take into account the aging of the Baby Boomers, which should lower the participation due to rising retirements. But is that still a valid assumption given the drop in wealth since 2006?
2. If you take into account the aging of the Baby Boomers, the participation rate should be trending lower. Indeed, it has been doing just that since 2000. Before the Great Recession, the Congressional Budget Office predicted what the partipation rate would be in 2012, assuming such demographic changes. Using that number, the real unemployment rate would be 10.7%.
3. Of course, the participation rate usually falls during recessions. Yet even if you discount for that and the aging issue, the real unemployment rate would be 9.3%.
4. If the participation rate just stayed where it was last month, the unemployment rate would have risen to 8.4%.
5. Then there's the broader, U-6 measure of unemployment which includes the discouraged plus part-timers who wish they had full time work. That unemployment rate, perhaps the truest measure of the labor market's health, is still a sky-high 14.5%.
6. The employment-population ratio dipped to 58.4% vs. 61% in December 2008. An historically and alarmingly low level of the U.S. population is actually working.
7. And given that real disposable income has been flat the past two years, it stands to reason that many of the jobs being created are in low-wage sectors. Indeed, hiring in sectors such as retail and leisure has accounted for a whopping 40 percent of the jobs added over the past two years.
The labor market remains in sad shape"”despite Obama White House claims that it’s “continuing to heal”"”and it is unlikely to improve much if the economy continues to grow around 2% or so.
James Pethokoukis is a columnist and blogger at the American Enterprise Institute. Previously, he was the Washington columnist for Reuters Breakingviews, the opinion and commentary wing of Thomson Reuters.
Pethokoukis was the business editor and economics columnist for U.S. News & World Report from 1997 to 2008. He has written for many publications, including The New York Times, The Weekly Standard, Commentary, National Review, The Washington Examiner, USA Today and Investor's Business Daily.
Pethokoukis is an official CNBC contributor. In addition, he has appeared numerous times on MSNBC, Fox News Channel, Fox Business Network, The McLaughlin Group, CNN and Nightly Business Report on PBS. A graduate of Northwestern University and the Medill School of Journalism, Pethokoukis is a 2002 Jeopardy! Champion.
Pethokoukis can be reached james.pethokoukis@aei.org or follow him on Twitter @JimPethokoukis
Thanks to the anti-journalism on display at the mainstream media, we will never know, as they prefer.
Obamas’ polices do to work its just headwins. He will NOT loose! Your a bigget and your poles are rasist!
According to the Department of Labor’s own statistics, the percent of people of employable age who were employed was 62-63% all through Bush 43′s term, falling dramatically to 58.5% during 2009, and remaining there all through Obama’s term.
This number is easier to understand and harder to manipulate than all those other numbers. Find it at
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300000
Actually the numbers weren’t terrible, they weren’t great but with the previous two month upward revisions they certainly weren’t terrible. Pethokoukis as usual exaggerates. And these elaborate calculations to make the picture look worse are a bit silly, the numbers are what they are. Demand remains weak and total federal/state govt spending is actually falling so the silver bullet if there is one is pump priming by one means or another and this means either more tax cuts or government spending.
The U-6 rate is NOT a measure of unemployment, as that would be contradictory, counting people with jobs ( albeit underemployed) as unemployed.
As people get older and drop out of the employment pool, all else being equal, the unemployment rate should drop. So Obama should get zero credit for aging baby boomers. It’s not fair to state discount that impact.
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website
XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
The Enterprise Blog is a project of the American Enterprise Institute. We are committed to giving you thoughtful and timely analysis on economic, foreign and social policy and politics. Check back often for updates.
The American Enterprise Institute takes no institutional positions on policy advocacy or political campaigns. The views expressed on The Enterprise Blog represent those of the individual writers.
Read Full Article »